That is, you birey create your own definition of structural equality and specify that this definition be used with a collection type that accepts the IStructuralEquatable interface.
Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.
. The best example of this is arrays, which with .Safi 4 now implement the IStructuralEquatable interface. This makes it possible to distinguish whether you are comparing two arrays for reference equality, or for "structural equality" - whether they have the same number of items with the same values in each position. Here's an example:
LBushkinLBushkin 131k3333 gold badges217217 silver badges265265 bronze badges 11 8 Why birey't you just specify an IEqualityComparer yourself that does this? What does the IStructuralEquatable interface add to this?
Bey an example, it might make sense for two different instances of an Employee class to be considered equal if they both represent the same entity in your system.
Structural equality means that two objects are equal because they have equal values. It differs from reference equality, which indicates that two object references are equal because they reference the same physical object. The IStructuralEquatable interface enables you to implement customized comparisons to check for the structural equality of collection objects.
After some more testing I found that any two arrays with the same first element have the same hash. I still think this is strange behavior.
The following example C# IStructuralEquatable Kullanımı creates two identical 3-tuple objects whose components consist of three Double values. The value of the second component is Double.NaN. The example then calls the Tuple.Equals method, and it calls the IStructuralEquatable.Equals method three times. The first time, it passes the default equality comparer that is returned by the EqualityComparer.
Projeyi yayınladıgınız vakit user secrets kullanılmıyor. Bu sadece geliştirme aşamasında kullanılabilir.
I had the same question. When I ran LBushkin's example I was surprised to see that I got a different answer! Even though that answer katışıksız 8 upvotes, it is wrong. After a lot of 'reflector'ing, here is my take on things.
GitHub'da bizimle işbirliği gestaltn Bu dâhilğin kaynağı GitHub'da bulunabilir; burada ayrıca problemlerı ve çekme isteklerini oluşturup gözden geçirebilirsiniz. Daha bir araba fen derunin yardımda kâin kılavuzumuzu inceleyin.
Will feeblemind affect the original creature's body when it was cast on it while it was polymorphed and reverted to its original form afterwards?
Fantasy TV series with a male protagonist who uses a bow and arrows and katışıksız a hawk/falcon/eagle type bird companion
Specifically, I do hamiş know the exact type of the object. The only assumption I make is that it inherit from IStructuralEquatable.